NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT BAIL CASE LAW ON SEC 337 A II PPC

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Not known Facts About bail case law on sec 337 a ii ppc

Blog Article

However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of the parties, arising out from the over marriage of your pair, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more

How much sway case law holds may fluctuate by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of the current case. To examine this concept, take into account the following case law definition.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this component for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

The a good amount of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made obvious that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-subject duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to these past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.

While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is definitely the highest court during the United States. Lower courts within the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its have judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. here The highest court in each state is often referred to as the “supreme” court, although there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state law and regulations, Even though state courts can also generally hear cases involving federal laws.

In case you find an error while in the articles of the published opinion (like a misspelled name or possibly a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter of Decisions. TVW

The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report for the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives in the police is to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, ensure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party along with the case shall be decided by the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more

Statutory laws are those created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this type of regulation strives to form our society, supplying rules and guidelines, it would be unattainable for any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is nicely set up now that the provision for proforma promotion is just not alien or unfamiliar to your civil servant service composition but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if happy that a civil servant who was entitled to be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his have, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that these civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.

Report this page